A Case Study on Animal Testing Essay

Imagine a world where humans argon taken to laboratories and tested on in a c bothous manner. A world where people are injected with harsh drugs and chemicals that physically and mentally harm their bodies and their life. If this scenario does not sound acceptable to act upon humans, so it surely canisternot be right for brutes. Right now in the world thousands of fleshlys are experiencing this, and it most defiantly is not fair. brute exam should be halt because it is not only cruel, but unnecessary since there are alternative testing methods and zoology rights.See more Examples of satire in adventures of huckfinn essayThe statistics of animal testing reflect the cruel and inhumane behavior that it exercises. Tests sometimes require thousands of animals and can last for one month or even an animals entire life. (Watson, 2009, Animal Testing p.32) The tests affect the animals in a brutal, harsh manner that could result in death. In fact 50% of all animals that are tested on end up dying. (Pros and Cons of Animal Testing 2013, para. 2) America is one of the countries that tests on animals most commonly. Government facilities in America that subject to animal testing are the Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Transportation, National Toxicology Program, and the Department of Agriculture. But surprisingly these tests arent required by righteousness in America. (Peta, Animal Testing 101, para. 3) Over 100 million animals suffer each year and $1 million is spent on experiments and equipment for testing. Animal testing uses 40% of all research funding from the U.S. National Institute of Health. (Watson, 2009, Animal Testing p.9) It is necessary that the statistics of animal testing are revealed to those who adopt been misinformed or undereducated of the issue.The despicable methods of testing that are used presently have shown to be brutal and potent. The experiments involve the usage of rats, birds, guineapigs , cats, monkeys, goats, rabbits, fish, mice, and dogs. (Vivisection, 6th ed., p.1, 2013) The experiments are chiefly for the purpose of cosmetics, medicine, household cleaners. A lethal poisoning test invented around the time of World War Iin which animals are force-fed increasing doses of a chemical until they dieis still the single most common animal test in use today. Examples of the drugs and chemicals that are used on the creatures are penicillin, morphine, and aspirin- all of which have the potential to kill the animals. The animals are burned, shocked, isolated, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and receive brain damage. (Edwards, 2011, Animal Testing)The methods of testing are dermal penetration, eye irritancy, carcinogenicity. corking toxicity, reproductive and DEV toxicity, neurotoxity, skin corrosivity/irritation, ecotoxicity, and pyrogeniaty. (Vivisection, 6th ed., p.1, 2013) Also, the conditions in the laboratories are unsanitary and horrible for living. The ani mals are deprived of food and water, their waste is not kept after, and they are near packed in small cages regardless of their state of health. The worst part is that the animals are given no pain killers of put under anesthesia, therefore they are forced to suffer for countless hours. This way of so-called science is extremely atrocious to the lives of animals, and needs to be stopped for good.The methods of animal testing that are broadly used in America are unnecessary since there are alternative methods of testing. Richard Klausner, former head of the National Cancer Institute, once said, We have ripened mice of cancer for decades and it simply didnt work in humans (Pros and Cons of Animal Testing 2013, para. 5) Basically what Klausner is saying is that it is hard to fix humane issues by testing on animals. The results will usually come out as inaccurate or unreliable. The differences between a human body and an animal body are very distinct. There are animatic, metabolic, and cellular difference between the two. There are endless alternative options to replace the merciless environment of regular animal testing. Scientists can study cell cultures by using computer modeling, create artificial human skin, use Vitro testing, and even test on human volunteers These unused methods harm no living creatures and are becoming increasingly popular. (Peta, Animal Testing 101, para. 6) For example,the makers of botox have begun to run tests on cells in a lab dish instead of on live animals. Also, it was found that sunscreen can be tested on humans and brings results that are accurate 93% of the time. It is time to turn animal testing into a relic of the past, because better methods exist that are efficient.Lastly, animals deserve to live their lives kick from suffering and exploitation. Animals rights are only when as equal to the rights that humans possess. All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way and to the same degree that humans do. They fee l pain, pleasure, fear, frustration, loneliness, and motherly love. Animals also show loyalty, and communicate with each other. (Animal Rights Movement 2001, Animal Rights section) Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent wortha value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. Animals do not have a voice, so therefore, humans are their voice. Most animal rights activists stick to the idea that animals should be free to do as they please, which is not a hard task to accomplish. It is very easy to leave animals where they belong, and let them live their life naturally and without human interference. Animals should be as free as people to roam about and do their animal things unmolested and restrained by humans. So that is exactly what needs to be done. Humans need to understand that animals should have basic rights the right to not be tortured, neglected or killed needlessly.Overall, animal testing can be describe as plainly wrong. Animal testing sh ould be stopped because it is not only cruel, but unnecessary since there are other testing options and animals have rights. Animals rarely serve as good models for the human body therefore animal experimenters are simply wasting the innocent lives of animals. The animals undergo poisoning, shocking, burning, and even death. These methods can be avoided because there are alternative options, so animal testing can be deemed as unneeded and inefficient. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other means of testing product toxicity are available.